The Synchronous Converter

Following an incident in 2006 when a refuge’s collection vehicle reversed into a member of the public who subsequently died from his injuries. A court in Newcastle has fined North Tyneside council £40,000 and £7000 costs.

The council stated at the city’s Crown Court that since the incident they have undertaken a fully comprehensive study and adjustment of safety procedures to ensure that such an incident will not happen again.

North Tyneside Council had pleaded guilty in response to charges that they broke section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Act. Specifically that on 2 May 2006 not far from his home Allanville, a refuse vehicle reversed into Mr. Brian Kindred causing him serious injuries from which he did not recover.

In evidence given to the court Health and Safety Executive inspector Stephen Britton stated that his investigations had indicated that the safety management procedures implemented by North Tyneside council were inadequate to avoid such an incident.

He said that in his opinion training with regard to guiding vehicles when reversing was “cursory” and that there was no supervision available. He went on to say that, it would have been a simple matter for the council to follow control measures that are both straightforward and simple and were commonplace within the recycling industry.

In response, the council said that it now had in place new safeguards that included rear viewing cameras on its refuse collection vehicles as well as other electronic devices aimed at assisting drivers and operators to safely manoeuvre.

Training and guidance to combat such incidents is often very simple and may involve little more than common sense. Unfortunately, without proper training many companies fail to see the dangers in relatively simple and straightforward operations. To seek guidance and training to avoid such tragic accidents at check out the NEBOSH General Certificate from Workplace Law Training.

Comments Off

A college education is necessary for an aspiring paralegal. Those living in the United States have access to 600 paralegal training programs. Obviously with that many to choose from, a person’s choice will determine the educational outcome as it will vary. There are variations in degrees as well, which can be made of more or less semester credits and can contain more or less content.

Your Choices in Paralegal Programs are:

Paralegal Associate Degree: Attend a two or four year establishment to achieve this. Complete 60 to 70 units. Paralegal courses and general educational courses are combined to meet the requirements.

Baccalaureate Degree Programs: Can only be earned at a four-year college or university that offer paralegal studies in major, minor, or concentrations from within a major. These programs vary from 30 to 60 semester units with a complete focus in paralegal and then the remaining semester units are general. These combined total 120 - 130 semester units.

Certificate Programs: Can be earned at almost any institution and consist of 18 to 60 semester units. Longer programs are closely related to associates.
Master’s Degree Programs: Can be earned at colleges and universities that provide students with undergraduate paralegal degree programs. These also offer advanced degrees relating to paralegal educational needs.

Comments Off

EFF Defends Right to Publish Links to Electronic Voting Memos
Electronic Frontier Foundation Media Release
San Francisco - Defending the right to link to controversial information about flaws in electronic voting systems, EFF announced today it will defend an Internet Service Provider (ISP) and a news website publisher against claims of indirect copyright infringement from the electronic voting machines’ manufacturer.

On October 10, 2003, electronic voting company Diebold, Inc., sent a cease-and-desist letter to the nonprofit Online Policy Group (OPG) ISP demanding that OPG remove a page of links published on an Independent Media Center (IndyMedia) website located on a computer server hosted by OPG.

Diebold sent out dozens of similar notices to ISPs hosting IndyMedia and other websites linking to or publishing copies of Diebold internal memos. OPG is the only ISP so far to resist the takedown demand from Diebold.

“What topic could be more important to our democracy than discussions about the mechanics and legitimacy of electronic voting systems now being introduced nationwide?” said EFF Staff Attorney Wendy Seltzer. “EFF won’t stand by as corporations like Diebold chill important online debate by churning out legal notices to ISPs that usually just take down legitimate content rather than face the legal risk.”

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) passed by Congress in 1998 provides a “safe harbor” as an incentive for ISPs to take down user-posted content when they receive cease-and-desist letters such as the ones sent by Diebold. By removing the content, or forcing the user to do so, for a minimum of 10 days, an ISP can take itself out of the middle of any copyright claim. As a result, few ISPs have tested whether they would face any liability for such user activity in the first place. EFF has been exposing some of the ways the safe harbor limits online speech through the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse.

“We defend strongly the free speech right of our client IndyMedia to publish links to Diebold memos relevant to the public debate about electronic voting machine security,” explained OPG Executive Director Will Doherty. “Diebold’s claim of copyright infringement from linking to information posted elsewhere on the Web is ridiculous, and even more silly is the claim that we as an ISP could be liable for our client’s web links.”

Links:
Cease-and-desist letter Diebold sent to OPG
IndyMedia Web page subject to Diebold cease-and-desist letter
Security researchers discover huge flaws in e-voting system
Link to Chilling Effects on DMCA safe harbor provisions
Contact:
Wendy Seltzer
Staff Attorney
Electronic Frontier Foundation
wendy@eff.org

Will Doherty
Executive Director
Online Policy Group
press@onlinepolicy.org

About EFF:
The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading civil liberties organization working to protect rights in the digital world. Founded in 1990, EFF actively encourages and challenges industry and government to support free expression and privacy online. EFF is a member-supported organization and maintains one of the most linked-to websites in the world at http://www.eff.org/

About Online Policy Group:
The Online Policy Group (OPG) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to online policy research, outreach, and action on issues such as access, privacy, the digital divide, and digital defamation. The organization fulfills its motto of “One Internet With Equal Access for All” through programs such as donation-based email, email list hosting, website hosting, domain registrations, colocation services, technical consulting, educational training, and refurbished computer donations. The California Community Colocation Project (CCCP) and QueerNet are OPG projects. OPG focuses on Internet participants’ civil liberties and human rights, like access, privacy, safety, and serving schools, libraries, disabled, elderly, youth, women, and sexual, gender, and ethnic minorities. Find out more at http://www.onlinepolicy.org/

About the author:

Press Release

Comments Off